Ibn Sina Foundation - Child Development Center

Concept Outline
Education is a race to be won, those who start first are more likely to finish ahead

A Case for Support
Each day in the U.S. 2019 babies are born into poverty. Almost 80% of poor children live in working households. One in five children is poor during the first 3 years of life – the time of the greatest brain development. An American child is born without health insurance every minute (National Center for Children in Poverty, 2004).

Poverty is associated with substandard housing, homelessness, inadequate childcare, unsafe neighborhoods and under resourced schools. Poor children are at greater risk than higher income children for a range of problems including detrimental affects on IQ, poor academic achievement, poor socioeconomic functioning, developmental delays, behavioral problems, asthma, poor nutrition, low birth weight and pneumonia. The reality of child poverty can have lasting, negative, affects: It can impede children’s cognitive development and their ability to learn as well as contribute to behavioral, social, and emotional problems as well as lead to poor heath among children (National Center for Children in Poverty, 2004).

Poverty is most prevalent among black and Hispanic children. Having immigrant parents increases a child’s chances of being poor: 26% of children of immigrants are poor. Poverty rates are highest for very young children: 20% of children in the U.S. under the age of 6 live in poor families (National Center for Children in Poverty, 2004).

Of the ten most populated states, the percent of poor children is highest in Texas at 29%. Hispanic children in this country disproportionately lack healthcare coverage. According to a 2004 report by Covering Kids & Families, there are 2.9 million uninsured Latino/Hispanic children in the U.S. One out of every five under the age of 18 lacks healthcare insurance.” This information is significant for Houston on many levels. Currently 75% of Houston children between the ages of 0-17 are either African American or Hispanic (Dr. Stephen Klineberg, Rice University).

In Texas
Low-Income Children: 49% (3,097,951) of children live in low-income families (National: 39%), defined as income below 200% the poverty level ($20,000 annual for a family of 4).
Poor Children: 23% (1,451,358) of children live in poor families (National: 18%), defined as income below 100% of the federal poverty level.
 24% (574,119) of white children live in low-income families
 58% (461,934) of black children live in low-income families
 69% (1,992,124) of Latino children live in low-income families
 74% (1,024,818) of children of immigrant parents live in low-income families including Asians
 41% (1,819,883) of children of native-born parents live in low-income families. (National Center for children in poverty, Columbia University, School of Public Health 2005)
In Houston
Top 3 state for children and adults living in poverty (Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 2007).

Negative Effects of Poverty
In a recent world ranking of infant mortality rates (one of the measures by which a country’s health and well-being is evaluated) by the U.S. Department of State and the CIA World Fact Book, the United States currently ranks 36th in the world with 6.62 deaths per 1000 births. Thirty-seventh and eighth are Taiwan (6.52/1000) and Cuba (6.45/1000) respectively.
Children born into poverty often experience a number of negative affects on their cognitive development. Lack of access to regular health care, dental care, good nutrition and/or quality day care can all contribute to a child’s early development. Because in Texas, the majority of children living in poverty hail from non-English speaking families, securing medical care through federal programs like the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), does not happen as often as it should. Even though CHIP has experienced budget cuts over the past three years some children and their families do qualify (Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 2005).

Unfortunately, the first reductions since the program was adopted in 1999, affected the program’s benefits, eligibility and operation. The cuts eliminated income deductions that families could use to qualify for CHIP; imposed higher co-payments and monthly premiums; instituted a 90-day waiting period before children could be covered; and did away with mental health, dental and vision coverage. Other barriers such as language and/or documentation often prohibit parents from accessing the program. Awareness of the program and/or the often intimidating process of registration are other issues.

The “Achievement Gap”
Academics for a child from an impoverished family can be a challenge. The “achievement gap” is often used when talking about the gap between the minorty student entering pre-K and his/her white/affluent counterpart. The “achievement gap” is a matter of race and class. Across the U.S., a gap in academic achievement persists between minority and disadvantaged students and their white counterparts. This is one of the most pressing education-policy challenges that states currently face. By the time minority students reach 12th grade, if they have not dropped out of school, their achievement levels are about four years behind other young people (U.S. Department of Education, Closing the Achiement Gap, 2006).

Lack of Child Development Initiatives – Influence on Violence
A 1996 Harvard and Berkley study examined income inequality in all 50 states. Both studies found that states with higher income inequality have the following social problems: higher death rates for all age groups; higher rates of homicide; higher rates of violent crimes; higher costs per person for police protection; higher rates of incarceration; higher rates of unemployment; a higher percentage of people receiving income assistance and food stamps; higher high school dropout rates; less state funds spent per person on public education; fewer books per person in schools; higher infant mortality rates; higher heart disease; higher cancer rates; a greater percentage of people without medical insurance; a greater number of babies born with low birth weight; a greater number of people unable to work because of disabilities; higher tobacco use; higher costs per person for medical care (Escobar, G., 1999).

Immigrant Families
On average, “recent immigrants earn about one-third less than natives,” according to George Borjas of Harvard University. He found that 21% of immigrant households are on welfare, compared to 14% of native households -- with immigrants tending to stay on welfare longer. He estimates that 30% of the growth in the gap between rich and poor in America can be attributed to the impact of immigrants.

Mark Regets, an economist with the National Science Foundation, reports that “after about ten years in the U.S., recent immigrants are earning wages about equal to those of natives with similar levels of schooling. But since they don't have the same educational levels of Americans overall, an earnings gap may persist for up to four generations (Bray, A. J., 1996). Lack of education and employment opportunities are seen as primary causes of poverty in the United States and better education is said to be the single best way to permanently break the cycle of poverty.

Background

Why Child Development Center is required?

What is Early Childhood Development (ECH)?

 In recent years researchers have learned that the human brain develops the vast majority of its neurons, and is at its most receptive to learning, between birth and three years of age. Early education can play a critical role during this important developmental period.

 Research linking early intervention to both cognitive and socio-emotional gains has fueled the proliferation of early childhood programs since the early part of the twentieth century.

 The last four decades in particular have produced many new practices and principles for use in the classroom with young children, as well as countless books, videos, and activities to enrich the home environment.

Importance of Early Childhood Development

 The rate of child poverty in the U.S. is twice higher than other industrialized nations
 Infant mortality is more than double in African Americans
 Minority children under the age of 5 have a higher mortality rate
 Children under age 18 – 16% (11 million) live below federal poverty level
 Low family income and education levels leads to racial and ethnic achievement gaps
 Currently, 71% white children enter kindergarten compared to only 57% of African American
 Early academic failure and school behavior problems are more common in minority population due to the lack of supervision, single parenting and/or the lack of early development and interaction
 Lack of early childhood development leads to high dropout rates, delinquency, and unemployment
 Many children that lack early childhood development are from single parent families
 62% (10 million) working mothers had children < 6 years of age
 Unstructured day care or babysitting leads to the lack of early childhood development because there is no structured interaction and/or learning involved
 Children watch more TV because many parents are not at home in the day time – this leads to a lack of early development
 Many of these children suffer from nutritional deficiencies i.e., America’s poor children

Why are these Children at-risk?
 Language and literacy problems due to the lack of early interventions & development
 Consequently, children enter the school system with smaller vocabularies and fewer critical skills
 These children start out behind, they are less able to benefit from the instruction presented to them by their teachers
 The academic gap between their performance and that of more affluent students widens each year
 Consequences- High absenteeism, low performance, class retentions, delinquency
 Many attend remedial/ special ed classes, and have high failing grades which ultimately leads to dropouts
 Because these students are behind, failing and do not understand their lessons, they have a lack of motivation for learning and suffer from low self-esteem and low-self confidence
 High dropout, failure to complete high schooling – 80% of Texas Department of Corrections prisoners are high school dropouts

 Because these students become high school dropouts, many are illiterate and unskilled, this group suffers high unemployment

Children Targeted for Intervention
Early Childhood Development Program in Southwest Houston

 43% live 200% under the federal poverty level (e.g., 2006 federal poverty level is $20,000 for a family of 4).
 More than 30% of children less than 4 years of age are not going to pre-school (in the SW Houston area).
 Compounding the problem, underprivileged families in SW Houston rely on untrained baby sitters
 The Ibn Sina Pilot Community has identified at least 200-300 children within its immediate service area as the target population.

Ibn Sina Child Development Center

Program Objectives
 Provide high quality, accessible, affordable early care and education options by supporting and strengthening families to promote healthy growth and development of our children

Vision
 To develop long term programs for families to see our children in the leadership role

Objectives
 To enhance children’s growth and development
 To provide children with educational, health and nutritional services
 To strengthen families as the primary nurture of their children

Premise
 Academic success, health and general well being of children

Program Goal
 100% high school completion of the pilot population by 2020

Philosophy
 Early childhood Family Education
 Nursery, Childcare
 Pre-kindergarten, Kindergarten
 Head Start for elementary school
 Support working parents

Strategies
 Maternal Services, clinical and nutritional support to mothers during pregnancy
 Child Care 0-2 years well baby clinic; nutrition, immunization and growth monitoring
 Child Care 2-4 years educational programs, prepare children to succeed in elementary and secondary school

Program Design

Plan
1. Health Maternal and Child Health services at Ibn Sina Community Clinics
2. Education Early Childhood Education – Pre school language and literacy
3. Social Support Encourage women to work for the family well-being

Governance
 Ibn Sina Foundation Board of Directors
 Comprehensive Primary Health Care Program; Management and Advisory
 Comprehensive Early Childhood Development; Management and Advisory

Community Participation
 Identification of disadvantaged children
 Support program’s funding
 Participate in family strengthening
 Volunteer – in child care programs
 Support staff & management in executing the early childhood development programs
 Decision making in child welfare activities

Implementation
 MCH clinical and nutritional program will be implemented in new building facility
 Early Childhood Program will be started in rental premises
 100 children will be registered for 3 years program, children > 2 years of age
 300 children will be housed in next 3 years
 New building facility will be planned in next 3 years
 After success capacity will be doubled in next 6 years

Child Development Center’s Components
 Cognitive; increase preschool child’s cognitive and intellectual performance
 Family; support home environments, promoted by parents participation in educational, social, and health opportunities
 Social; improve preschool child’s social competence and social interaction skills
 Health; increase child’s use of preventive health screening and medical care

Program Policy
 Quality; as soon as child is admitted developmental & learning skill so that child is ready for schooling with high academic performance.
 Curriculum; language and literacy, telling, writing, phonemic awareness, alphabets awareness, basic mathematical concepts, number recognition, comparisons, color patterns, scientific explorations and logical thinking.
 Assessment, methodological testing, continuous ongoing performance monitoring.
 Student Teacher Ratio 20 students per class with 1.5 teacher ratio
 Methods and materials, to be developed and purchased
 Activities, Ibn Sina land/ property for children to use for extra curricular activities.

Potential Community Impact of Program

Outcomes

Short-term
 Better working public schools, with competent students produced through ECHD program
 Better academic learning - reduce difficulty in school learning
 Reduction in retentions and expenses on make up/special classes teaching
 Better school grades, less chances of failure and less ESL expenses
 Reduction in high school dropout
 Social benefit; more than 25 female staff would be employed – opportunity

Long-term
 High number of school gradates, motivated for higher learning
 Entry of underserved and minority children into professionals institutions
 More educated workers
 Quality of life for families due to better earnings
 Reduce poverty level and low birth weight children
 Reduction in the occurrence of developmental disabilities
 Reduction in crime in the society

Success Indicators
 IQ Scores; testing
 Scholastic Achievements; high flyers
 Scholastic Placement; academic placement in high caliber institutions, such as MIT
 Non-cognitive development; social responsibility and effectiveness

Sustainability
 Refer operating budget 2007-2011

Footnotes
Bray, Anna (1996). "Is the U.S. Importing Poverty?" Investor's Business Daily
Borger, C., et al., (2006). "Health Spending Projections Through 2015: Changes on the Horizon,"
Health Affairs Web Exclusive W61
Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 2007
Escobar, Gabriel (1999). "Immigrants' Ranks Tripled in 29 Years," Washington Post
Texas Health and Human Services Commission, “Texas CHIP Enrollment, Renewal and Disenrollment Rates by County, 2004
Hegstrom, Edward, (2000). Immigrants lacking health coverage Houston’s rate worst in nation. The Houston Chronicle
National Center for Children in Poverty (NCCP), Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health 2004
Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 2005
U.S. Census Bureau’s Annual Demographic Survey, 2004
U.S. Department of Education, Closing the Achiement Gap, No Child Left Behind 2006
U.S. Department of State and the CIA World Fact Book 2002-2006 Geography IQ